What has changed? The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the management of acute biliary pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic thoroughly changed the daily practices of medicine. We retrospectively evaluated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our management strategies for patients with acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP). METHODS: A total of 91 patients with ABP who were treated at Trakya University Faculty of Medicine between March 15, 2019 and March 15, 2021 were retrospectively recruited. Patients were classified as pre-COVID and COVID-era patients. The comorbidity markers, data from laboratory tests, inflammatory markers, and radiological examinations were evaluated. Length of stay, need for an intensive care unit, morbidity, mortality, recurrent ABP, and definitive treatment rates were evaluated, and the data of the two periods were compared. RESULTS: Two groups of patients, 57 in the pre-COVID period and 34 in the COVID period, were included in the study. We found that ABP admissions decreased significantly during periods of increased national COVID-19 diagnoses. Type 2 diabetes mellitus was significantly higher in the COVID period patients (P=0.044), and COVID patients had significantly higher total (P=0.004), direct bili-rubin (P=0.007), and lipases (P<0.001). The cholecystectomy rate after an attack decreased from 26% in the pre-COVID period to 15.6% during COVID. CONCLUSION: COVID strikingly reduced the admissions of ABP patients in the early stages of the disease to hospitals, leading to inevitable admissions in advanced severity. Moreover, a significant increase was detected in the recurrence rates of ABP. This can be explained by the reduction in cholecystectomy performed.

The evaluation of morbidity in gastrointestinal tumor patients underwent cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC).

Objectives: In this study, we aimed to determine the postoperative morbidity rate and identify demographic, clinical, and treatment-related variables that may be potential risk factors for morbidity in gastrointestinal tumor patients undergoing hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with or without cytoreductive surgery (CRS). Material and Methods: In this retrospective study, 60 patients who had undergone HIPEC due to gastrointestinal tumor between October 2017 and December 2019 were included. Systemic toxicities were graded and evaluated according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0 criteria. Results: Mean age of the patients was 60.43 ± 12.83. Primary tumor localization was the stomach in 33 patients (55%), colon in 21 (35%), rectum in five (8.3%), and appendix in one patient (1.7%). PCI mean value was 9.51 ± 10.92. CC-0 was applied in 37 (61.7%) patients, CC-1 in 11 (18.3%), CC-2 in 6 (10%), and CC-3 in six patients (10%). Morbidity was observed in 50 (83.33%) of the 60 patients participating in the study according to NCI-CTCAE v3.0 classification. Mild morbidity rate was 46.6%, severe morbidity rate was 36.6%, and mortality rate was 11.66%. Enteric diversion application, length of stay in the ICU, and length of hospital stay were shown to have a statistically significant effect on the NCI-CTCAE morbidity score (p= 0.046, p= 0.004, p <0.001). Conclusion: With proven beneficial effects on survival in patients with locally advanced gastrointestinal tumors, CRC and HIPEC are acceptable in these patients despite their increased morbidity and mortality rate. With new studies on this subject, morbidity and mortality rates may be reduced.

An experimental study: the effect of S. boulardii on abemaciclibinduced diarrhea.

BACKGROUND: In our study, we aimed to investigate the protective effects of Saccharomyces boulardii on abemaciclib-induced diarrhea model, which is a commonly used drug in breast cancer. METHODS: Thirty rats were divided into 3 groups as control (Group 1), abemaciclib (Group 2), and abemaciclib + Saccharomyces boulardii (Group 3) groups. The clinical status, body weight, and defecation status were monitored daily. At the end of the 15-day experiment period, the rats were killed with high-dose anesthesia and the resected small intestine segments were evaluated histopathologically. Lesions were classified according to thickening of the villus, inflammation and edema of mucosa and intraepithelial leukocyte accumulation. Then, mean values of both crypt depths and villi thicknesses were calculated for each rat. Normal distribution assumption was controlled with the Shapiro-Wilk test. One-way analysis of variance for normally distributed variables in the comparisons of more than two independent groups and Kruskal-Wallis test for nonnormally distributed variables were used. The significance value was accepted as 0.05. RESULTS: : There was one death in Group 3, but none in the others. There were no findings of mucositis in Group I. There was mild diarrhea and weight loss in only one rat in Group 1. For the comparison of the severity of diarrhea (72.5%/39%) and weight loss (72.5%/45%), a decrease was found in Group 3 according to Group 2 (p < 0.01). Histopathological findings such as edema, inflammation, and intraepithelial leukocyte accumulation also showed a decrease in Group 3 compared to Group 2 (p < 0.01). DISCUSSION: Saccharomyces boulardii should be considered as a treatment option in abaemaciclib (chemotherapy)-induced diarrhea. Further comparative studies and in vivo human randomized controlled studies can be conducted in the future.

Predictive evaluation of SIRI, SII, PNI, and GPS in cholecystostomy application in patients with acute cholecystitis.

BACKGROUND: The aims of this study were to investigate the clinical significance of systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI), systemic inflammation index (SII), prognostic nutritional index (PNI), and Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) in deciding whether to perform cholecystostomy when determining if cholecystostomy is the right choice for acute cholecystitis (AC) patients. METHODS: Between January 2018 and December 2020, 126 consecutive patients with AC with and without cholecystostomy were retrospectively recruited from the Trakya University in Edirne, Turkey. Group I included AC patients with cholecystostomy and Group II included AC patients without cholecystostomy. The neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and lymphocyte/monocyte ratio (LMR) were calculated. The PNI and SII were calculated RESULTS: There is significant difference between the two groups by the comparison of SIRI, SII, PNI, and GPS values (p<0.001). In Group I, SIRI, SII, and GPS values are higher than the Group II and PNI value in Group I is lower than the Group II. Furthermore, the NLR and PLR ratios in Group I are significantly higher than Group II, and the LMR ratio in Group I is significantly lower than Group II. CONCLUSION: According to our study, we can say that NLR, PLR, SII, SIRI, and GPS are positive predictors and LMR and PNI are negative predictors for the severity of AC. Therefore, when we decide to treat AC medically, we may prefer the application of chole-cystostomy tube at the beginning of hospitalization by the help of evaluating NLR, PLR, LMR, SIRI, SII, GPS, and PNI values.

Relationship between SIRI, SII values, and Alvarado score with complications of acute appendicitis during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to investigate the clinical variations of Systemic Inflammatory Response Index (SIRI), Systemic Inflammation Index (SII), and Alvarado Score during the COVID-19 pandemic period. METHODS: Between March 2019 and March 2021, 161 consecutive patients who had surgery due to acute appendicitis were ret-rospectively recruited from Trakya University in Edirne, Turkey. Group I included patients who had surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic and Group II included patients who had surgery before the COVID-19 pandemic period. A total of 80 patients volunteered for Group I and 81 patients for Group II. The neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet/lymphocyte ratio, and lymphocyte/monocyte ratio were calculated. SII was calculated by the formula: platelet (P) × neutrophil (N)/lymphocyte (L). NLR was calculated by dividing the neutrophil count by the number of lymphocytes. SIRI was defined as follows: SIRI = (neutrophil × monocyte/lymphocyte). The Alvarado score was also calculated by using patient history, clinical examination, and laboratory findings. RESULTS: There was a significant difference between the two groups in terms of displacing pain, nausea/vomiting, right lower quad-rant tenderness, rebound, hyperthermia, leukocytosis, and total Alvarado score (p<0.001). There was a significant difference between two groups in comparison of C-reactive protein, SIRI, and SII values (p<0.001). Group I patients had higher values of these parameters than Group II. CONCLUSION: Based on the results obtained from this study, we conclude that COVID-19 pandemic has caused an increase in patients with acute appendicitis admitted to the hospital. This late diagnosis of acute appendicitis caused more complications during COVID-19 pandemic. Alvarado score, SIRI, and SII can be used as a marker to indicate whether complications of acute appendicitis occurred pre- or post-operatively. Therefore, Alvarado score, SIRI, and SII are directly proportional to the complication of acute appendicitis.

Pelvic actinomycosis presenting as a malignant pelvic mass: a case report.

INTRODUCTION: Pelvic actinomycosis constitutes 3% of all human actinomycosis infections. It is usually insidious, and is often mistaken for other conditions such as diverticulitis, abscesses, inflammatory bowel disease and malignant tumors, presenting a diagnostic challenge pre-operatively; it is identified post-operatively in most cases. Here we present a case that presented as pelvic malignancy and was diagnosed as pelvic actinomycosis post-operatively. CASE PRESENTATION: A 48-year-old Caucasian Turkish woman presented to our clinic with a three-month history of abdominal pain, weight loss and difficulty in defecation. She had used an intra-uterine device for 16 years, however it had recently been removed. The rectosigmoidoscopy revealed narrowing of the lumen at 12 cm due to a mass lesion either in the wall or due to an extrinsic lesion that prevented the passage of the endoscope. On examination, there was no gynecological pathology. Magnetic resonance imaging showed a mass, measuring 5.5 × 4 cm attached to the rectum posterior to the uterus. The ureter on that side was dilated. Surgically there was a pelvic mass adhered to the rectum and uterine adnexes, measuring 10 × 12 cm. It originated from uterine adnexes, particularly ones from the left side and formed a conglomerated mass with the uterus and nearby organs; the left ureter was also dilated due to the pelvic mass. Because of concomitant tubal abscess formation and difficulty in dissection planes, total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salphingo-oophorectomy was performed (our patient was 48 years old and had completed her childbearing period). The cytology revealed inflammatory cells with aggregates of Actinomyces. Penicillin therapy was given for six months without any complication. CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic actinomycosis should always be considered in patients with a pelvic mass especially in ones using intra-uterine devices, and who have a history of appendectomy, tonsillectomy or dental infection. Surgeons should be aware of this infection in order to avoid excessive surgical procedures.